The only publication dedicated to OSS     Volume 2, Issue 4 - September 2005
Current Issue
Cover Page
Intelligent Ethernet
Ethernet as a Carrier Service
MEF Speaks
Gig-E vs. SONET
Serving Up Ethernet
High Availability Services
End-to-End Ethernet
Ethernet’s Keys
 
Subscribe
About Us
Archives
Ed-Opps
Ad-Opps
Advertisers
Sponsors

Serving Up Ethernet (Cont'd)

The two alternatives for serving up Ethernet services are Ethernet over IP/MPLS, or Ethernet over SONET. RBOCs and other providers who met the demand for providing Ethernet services by adding Ethernet interfaces to existing SONET networks did so to take advantage of the QoS and resiliency offered by SONET, but there are limitations to this approach. SONET does work spectacularly for voice and private-line TDM traffic, but is not nearly as cost-effective in delivering Ethernet services.

The rollout of new Carrier Ethernet platforms, and the introduction of carrier-grade features onto existing platforms, has already begun to revolutionize the telecom services market. Carrier Ethernet's high bandwidth, which can deliver in excess of 20Mbps to each subscriber, is well-suited to the triple play. According to a recent study, 45 percent of carriers deploying Carrier Ethernet are doing so in order to support triple play offerings. In addition, new carrier Ethernet initiatives targeted at both enterprise and residential customers will inevitably trigger substantial growth in sales of Carrier Ethernet hardware. The market for Carrier Ethernet switches and routers in particular is set to explode, as switch makers jockey to support new telecom initiatives. This segment was worth $155 million in 2004, but is expected to exceed a billion dollars by the end of 2007.

The dominance of residential triple play serves as a major driver for new Carrier Ethernet platforms, while at the same time, the market for Frame Relay, ATM and private line services continues to erode, due to the simple price equation--Carrier Ethernet offers advanced IP services and includes carrier-class attributes that make it a functional equivalent of ATM, yet it's more cost-effective. According to the Metro Ethernet Forum, Carrier Ethernet is 25 to 40 percent lower in cost than TDM, Frame Relay, or ATM interfaces; it is 10 times lower in cost than high-speed SONET interfaces; and is more readily scalable for meeting increasing needs for bandwidth.

In addition, studies from Infonetics Research indicate that Carrier Ethernet is well suited to supporting out-of-franchise solutions--creating spectacular revenue opportunities for carriers and equipment providers alike. Carriers are encouraged to add services on top of their basic connections, such as VoIP, broadcast video, VoD and gaming; in addition, carriers may also benefit by expanding outside of their service area to gain new sources of revenue. In fact, many providers, RBOCs and others already support an existing base of SONET, Frame Relay, ATM and IP networks. However, providers in this highly competitive area are seeing Carrier Ethernet as a primary method of aggregation.

Many providers, in order to stay competitive and increase revenues, are seeking to expand out of their traditional boundaries, both to gain new customers and to serve existing ones that have locations outside of the carrier's traditional service boundaries. There are benefits to using Carrier Ethernet to facilitate this movement. In moving out-of-franchise, expanding a SONET or IP network would increase the financial burden and require substantial CapEx and OpEx investments, not to mention delay time to offer. The Metro Ethernet Forum suggests that by moving to Carrier Ethernet, cumulative OpEx savings will reach 23 percent after three years when compared with legacy private line, Frame Relay or ATM services. CapEx savings are further achieved due to the cost-effectiveness of Ethernet equipment, economies of scale, and relative simplicity of the technology.

Whether using Carrier Ethernet to expand Ethernet services within a carrier's existing domain, or out-of-franchise, there are several strategic options to consider. Carrier Ethernet is by far the most promising technology to accommodate the growing demand for high bandwidth Ethernet services.

 


Send Comment

 

Subscribe   About Us   Archives   Editorial Opportunities
Advertising Opportunities   Advertisers   Sponsors

© 2005, All information contained herein is the sole property of Pipeline Publishing, LLC. Pipeline Publishing LLC reserves all rights and privileges regarding the use of this information. Any unauthorized use, such as copying, modifying, or reprinting, will be prosecuted under the fullest extent under the governing law.