Pipeline Publishing, Volume 4, Issue 11
This Month's Issue:
Confronting Fraud and Malice
download article in pdf format
last page next page
Every Move You Make: Collecting Data
for LAES in Next-Gen Networks
back to cover

By Joe Hogan

Lawfully Authorized Electronic Surveillance (LAES) is challenging service providers to retain data through various criteria and across multiple next-generation networks such as WiMAX, cable and IMS—not an easy task when considering the expansive subscriber bases and massive amounts of data traveling across any given service provider network. This standard addresses the interfaces between a service provider and a law enforcement agency to assist the agency in conducting electronic surveillance; however, in the continuous mad scramble that is telecom today, this is easier said than done.

What does LAES Mean for Service Providers?

Lawful network surveillance and data retention mandates have gone from low-visibility, back-office functions to a critical need, for which operators may be required to compile millions of customer records in a matter of hours to turn over to authorities. The sheer volume becomes a stumbling block for operators, and the consequences of non-compliance are severe—it can lead to fines and even lawsuits, if surveillance is done improperly.

The sheer volume becomes a stumbling block for operators, and the consequences of non - compliance are severe—it can lead to fines and even lawsuits, if surveillance is done improperly.




New Regulations

LAES has been in play for several years; however, in the past couple of years, new global regulations have been put in place. For example, the European Union adopted Directive 2006/24/EC in March 2006, requiring the retention of data generated or processed in connection with publicly-available electronic
virtualVON

Further complicating this mandate is the emergence of converged services. With so many different types of data services, the laws are expanding to include information about all communication sessions, including phone calls, text messages, emails, and video and picture messages. This mandate brings cellular service to mind, but in actuality, extends across all providers of wireless, wireline, broadband, and cable services.

While all services are subject to LAES mandates, 85 percent of all intercepts executed worldwide are for communications over a mobile or portable device. To track these transactions, roving surveillance is of utmost importance. As networks grow in complexity with the deployment of next-generation infrastructures such as IMS, the demands made on systems that collect and correlate this data are steadily increasing.

communications services and public communications networks. Essentially, this means that operators of public telephone services and Internet service providers must retain personal data such as the calling number, the user ID, and the identity of a user of an IP address anywhere from six months to two years. The aim is to ensure that the data retained is available for the purpose of the investigation, detection, and prosecution of serious crimes.

While these types of regulations put specific parameters in place for service providers and ultimately provide valuable information to local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, they also add to the ever-growing challenge of efficiently retaining data. As IP-based traffic increases and networks bear
article page | 1 | 2 | 3 |
last page back to top of page next page
 

© 2006, All information contained herein is the sole property of Pipeline Publishing, LLC. Pipeline Publishing LLC reserves all rights and privileges regarding
the use of this information. Any unauthorized use, such as copying, modifying, or reprinting, will be prosecuted under the fullest extent under the governing law.